<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adding cross browser consistent keyboard short-cuts to your website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codeblog.shawson.co.uk/adding-cross-browser-consistent-keyboard-short-cuts-to-your-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codeblog.shawson.co.uk/adding-cross-browser-consistent-keyboard-short-cuts-to-your-website/</link>
	<description>development notes for my failing memory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 12:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://codeblog.shawson.co.uk/adding-cross-browser-consistent-keyboard-short-cuts-to-your-website/comment-page-1/#comment-4556</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.shawson.co.uk/?p=1324#comment-4556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice one! - Couldnt you write some config code so a user could decide which mapping to use? That would be alot more accessible for people who use a particular browser at home (Say Chrome) and want to use this browsers settings at work. Remember work environments only usually support IE, so giving a user the ability to use Chrome settings would be very accessible indeed! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one! &#8211; Couldnt you write some config code so a user could decide which mapping to use? That would be alot more accessible for people who use a particular browser at home (Say Chrome) and want to use this browsers settings at work. Remember work environments only usually support IE, so giving a user the ability to use Chrome settings would be very accessible indeed! <img src='http://codeblog.shawson.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
